Improve access review effective expansion gates#2219
Open
DENGXUELIN wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
/claim #667
Skill Improvement ($50-150 Bounty)
Related review issue: #667
Summary
This improves
access-reviewby adding effective-access expansion gates so reviewers certify actual access paths instead of direct-grant snapshots that miss nested groups, dynamic group rules, SCIM mappings, external IdP groups, app-local mappings, and break-glass paths.Changes
AR-EFF-01throughAR-EFF-08evidence gates.Not Evaluablehandling.Bounty Tier
Validation
git diff --cached --checkgit diff --check origin/main...HEADAR-EFF-01throughAR-EFF-08git merge-tree --write-tree origin/main HEADmatchesHEAD^{tree}HEAD^{tree}Payment preference
GitHub Sponsors, if accepted.